War, what is it good for? Well as Edwin Starr would say its
good for “Absolutely nothing”. Take a
look at our most destructive war for example, World War two. Its legacy
consists of the dead millions, the razed cities, the broken countries, and the
loss of an entire generation of bright young individuals. With so much death
and destruction, as well as the atrocities committed by the Nazis, it is hard
not to take Starr’s mentality. Death on that scale would have ripped through
the hearts of families world wide causing pain and sadness on a monumental
level. Think about it, for every soldier killed in combat a mother and father
lose a son or daughter. With so much pain why would war exist in the first
place though? Well as with many things war isn’t all bad and contrary to Edwin
Starr war is good for something’s. Even World War 2, with its death filled
legacy, was good for a few things. A World War 1 method of making ammonia, a
deadly gas, is now used to feed the worlds ever growing population (Haber
process). The great depression was supposedly ended by an economic uptick
caused by the war drive. After the war was fought, all the soldiers came home
to their wives and raised a family, which lead to the baby boomer generation.
Finally the most important thing war is good for is deciding who is right. Now
I don’t mean right as in who has the most moral and logical argument, I mean
“right” as in who has the bigger guns and the better strategy. The people who
are “right” win the war and ultimately get to portray how “wrong” the loser was
in. In the end, wars usually start over
who is right while the other salutary effects of war come as externalities
making question of what is war good for still a legitimate one regardless of
what Edwin Starr says.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.