Now, drug companies are putting less and less money towards researching new antibiotics. Instead drug companies are now focusing more on chronic illnesses because of money. It’s a money issue. People use antibiotics for about 10 days and then they are done with them until the next time they get sick. But people with chronic illnesses have to have medicine every day for the rest of their life, making these medicines more profitable. As the NY times points out, the FDA had a “scandal” several years ago over a drug that caused liver damage. Because of this scandal the FDA is more cautious about approving other antibiotics. Combined with the lack of revenue flowing in for antibiotics, the crackdown on drugs has been rough with the FDA only approving two antibiotics in the past decade.
Hardly any of us feel the effects of this now. But the snowball effect has already
started. It started when we changed
animal’s diets. Animal’s main diet now
is corn because it fattens them up quicker and brings them to our plates
faster. But animals, like cows, aren’t
used to eating corn, they are supposed to eat grass. As seen in Food Incorporated when a cow is
forced to eat corn its body is prone to sickness. These animals will then be treated with
antibiotics, but not all animals take antibiotics when they are just sick. Some
take it as a preventative measure. Antibiotics
used on the farm are not usually given out to treat sick animals, instead they
are given out to healthy animals to prevent them from contracting an illness.
Farmers feed animals antibiotics to kill off any bacteria the animal might
fight. The idea is the less energy the
animal has to use to fight off diseases, the quicker it will fatten up. These animals don’t need antibiotics when
they are healthy. And according to the
NY times “The overuse of antibiotics in people and animals, often for
conditions for which the drugs are ineffective or not needed, is seen as a
driving force in the development of resistant bacteria.”
As stated by the Washington Post, “Antibiotic-resistant
bacteria are spreading fast and now kill at least 23,000 Americans each
year.” The bacteria that affects livestock
has constantly been getting stronger posing a threat to humans. A Washington Post writer published an article
about casualties that occur in hospitals due to the overuse of antibiotics in
animal feed. The main story he
emphasized was about a “66-year-old woman”.
She was recovering from a heart bypass when she suddenly developed respiratory
failure and a serious infection. Doctors quickly gave her an antibiotic that
usually works but this this time it didn’t.
The doctors turned to a newer antibiotic that was supposed to target her
sickness, but the bacteria in her body were also resistant to this drug. The
woman died soon after.
Antibiotics are intended to return users back to full health. Since they have been used as a preventative
measure towards fighting bacteria, the bacteria has evolved to counteract this
defense. It’s like when we use
hand-sanitizer. A bottle of Purell will always
say “kills 99.9% of germs”. After it’s
used it leaves behind the strongest germs on our hands. When antibiotics are given to livestock they
kill off most of the bacteria the livestock is fighting. And because of this overuse we now have to
deal with the stronger bacteria. Since
drug companies are laying off the revenue for antibiotic research, I don’t see how
we can stay ahead of constantly evolving bacteria.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.